Twitter
RSS
Facebook

The Economic Populist – “Why I’m a little worried about the drop in oil”

Really interesting article on why we should be worried about the drop in oil tying in the drop in oil prices due to Lehman Bros as well as China. You’ll also learn the credo “What’s bad for Wall Street will be made bad for Main Street! Definitely worth reading.

The original article can be found at: www.economicpopulist.org/?q=content/why-im-little-worried-about-drop-oil

+-+-+-

Why I’m a little worried about the drop in oil

Can’t sleep, been thinking about the price of oil, worrying about it to be honest. Now you may be thinking “Venom, what are you crazy? A putz? A drop in the price of oil is a good thing!” And I would reply, yes, under normal circumstances it is. But these days, things ain’t so normal. Actually, right now, oil is up since yesterday, but it’s been in a slide for the past week or so.

A prophetic lunch

A couple years ago, I had lunch with a trading friend/mentor of mine at Hackney’s on Harms Road. He was an older gentleman, made his money in options, in fact was one of the first to trade at the CBOE back in the 1970s. We had just gotten back from one of those sales seminars from Equis, a company that makes a product called Metastock. While gobbling down on Hackney’s infamous onion loaf and later cheeseburgers, topics ranging from the software to commodities came up. This was around 2002, and Enron was still in the headlines.

I commented that a lot of the buy-side got burned by the fraud commited by folks like Kenneth Lay. The stock had collapsed, and the whole idea of trading energy products like electricity now seemed completely discredited. This was a big problem for Wall Street, I said. He then shook his head and said something that has stuck in my mind.

“John, what’s good for Main Street may not be good for Wall Street. What’s good for Wall Street may or may not be good for Main Street. But what is bad for Wall Street will be made bad for Main Street.”

Years later, through all the scandals, and now today’s financial crisis, that quote seems more truer than ever. Tax payers are now bailing out financial gamblers who knew better. From Long-Term Capital Management to Fannie and Freddie, all got cash infusions either from the government or a pool of investors corralled by the Treasury. In the end, even when it didn’t come directly from the tax payer, the tax payer soon paid through special tax deals and such. C’mon, you don’t think they aren’t talking about tax breaks in the halls of Congress for these financial firms that help out?

Lehman, oil, and anyone else holding the bag?

This brings us back to Lehman. For the past month, the price of oil has been dropping. A while back I commented that one of the reasons was that China stopped buying, because they stocked up before the Olympics. Coincidentally, this was also around the same time that Richard Fuld, the company’s CEO, said it was starting to sell assets to raise cash (kinda like what AIG has been saying for the past few days..hrmmmm). Lehman Brothers ran trading operations that dealt with everything from those infamous Credit Derivatives to commodities like oil or financial products based on oil (yes, believe it or not such a thing does exist!). Well whose to say that part of the fall in oil could be attributed to Lehman? That sounds like a good thing at first, that is until you think about it a bit longer. Their pain is your gain..or is it?

What’s bad for Wall Street will be made bad for Main Street!

Back in the beginning of the year, Lehman announced that they had bad earnings, yet Fuld said he would not raise capital. Then in June, the Times reported that Lehman was indeed raising capital. It was then made public that besides the issuance of new shares, that it was beginning to jettison some of it’s other holdings. If this is indeed the case, it would serve as an impetus for the fall in crude. Now as prices fall, other things start to happen.

You see, all these trades with these contracts involve margin. Now margin for futures trading is simply a deposit of a certain amount to control a commodities contract. The latest margin rates at the New York Mercantile Exchange shows that members pay $10,175/contract, while non-members pay $12,488. That’s, rounding them out, 10k-12.5k to control $93,750 (using latest prices) or 1,000 barrels worth of oil. Depending whether you were long or short, the margin maintenance, that is what is required to hold on to your position, could go up or down. If you are in a losing position, expect your margin requirements to increase mark to market.

You have to figure that a lot of folks, from institutional trading desks to pensions, are taking a bath. It has only been recently, in the past two years or so, that everyone has been saying that commodities/futures are now an asset class. Jim Rogers even wrote a damn book on why you should plow cash into commodities! It’s been my experience that when you see everyone talking about getting into something, that that’s often the top. Whether it’s stocks in ‘99, pork bellies in the 70s, real estate in this decade, or even beanie babies, it’s all the same! Crowd mentality, it never changes.

What’s bad for Wall Street will be made bad for Main Street!

Looking at the events transpiring this past week. One could easily come to the conclusion that even the so-called Masters of the Universe aren’t such market mavens. Well, perhaps Goldman Sachs or George Soros, but for a lot of hedge funds and institutional trading desks, this is their last quarter. And this is what worries me.

While we’re rejoicing in the price of crude dropping, margin clerks, the repo men of the financial industry, are also sharing in your joy. There isn’t a trader alive who doesn’t dread that one phone call. If you’re a retail client (like most folks), then odds are your broker will notify you to pay up the difference in margin. You normally got less than 24 hours before they liquidate your account. For larger clients, and I mean big time ones, they often have a risk management department or a guy somewhere keeping tabs on this…well that’s the idea anyways.

Are we going to have to bail out a commodities trading fund next?

Many of these desks, like we are seeing with Lehman or even AIG, were trading with enormous leverage. Often, able to borrow money at a discount, management would often grant the trading desk leverage many times the cash they carried; 40 to 1 was a norm in many places. And to the folks running the company, risk management was in their minds so what was the big deal?

Of course, with oil ratcheting on an ever higher price and research pointing to $100 then $200 price, things only looked good. What was the harm in increasing their position? You look at the volume, a 1000 lots of crude would go in a blink of an eye. And it wasn’t just oil, we saw an influx of new cash into everything from boring ol’ corn to gold. There was even Exchange Traded Funds on the American Stock Exchange and the NYSE that represented positions in these things. You got to figure that behind each new commodities mutual fund or ETF was a trading desk.

Yet, as you can see in that chart above, things didn’t go as high as people predicted. That isn’t to say oil couldn’t go to $200, I’m sure it will, but that won’t help the trader facing a margin call. Some daytrader like myself facing a margin call is one thing, but say a hedge fund with twenty or forty billion dollars worth of commodity contracts is a whole other ball game.

What’s bad for Wall Street will be made bad for Main Street!

Mark my words, you’re going to hear that some pension fund or trading desk or someone big got blown away dealing in futures. There is nothing wrong with futures trading, but despite what Jim Rogers says, this ain’t for everybody. You had smart Street folks who probably were more experienced in say equities or bonds or who knows what, enter something completely alien. Maybe they were familiar, but when you’re told to take advantage of a Goldman Sach’s research saying oil is going to $200, what are you going to do?

We are, as I’ve said already, going to pay for this. CDOs, swaps, corn, defaults, it don’t matter. At the end of the day, you and I will pay for someone else’s mistake. What is needed is more regulation in regards to leverage, that is critical. And if you think I’m making this up, Google the word “Forex” and you’ll see modern day bucket shops saying you’ll make oodles of unbelievable money trading currencies at 100-1 leverage! So yes, we need to reign in leverage. And you can’t be trying to get average folks to play the futures game. I’m sorry, but I’ve seen so many burned by this, it’s almost sick.

Maybe I’m wrong, maybe we should let anyone “play the market”, but then we’d still end up paying. Right now, or at least in this recent past, the financial machine didn’t care who their clients were. And if there was a problem, well you know what my mentor said:

What’s bad for Wall Street will be made bad for Main Street!

Designing a Trading System in MetaStock- Part 2

In Part 1 of Designing a Trading System in MetaStock, I had discussed the major components you needed to be able to track to create a mechanical entry system. These were measures of price, liquidity, trend, and volatility. The question now is, how do we code this into MetaStock?

First, let me offer you the most valuable piece of knowledge I have acquired over the years about MetaStock formula writing. This one secret will turn you into a MetaStock master. Do you think I know all of MetaStock`s hundreds of pre-programmed formula and propriety indicators? Well, I`m good, but I`m not that good.

When coding in MetaStock, the key to getting it “right” is to write what it is you are trying to achieve “down in English”. Once you`ve done this, it is easy to convert it into a MetaStock formula.

Let`s look at an example. Our first entry condition is a measure of price. As mentioned in Part 1, you want to set a price minimum to remove speculative stocks. Please note that the values you select will depend on the exchange you are trading. Some markets tend to be more expensive than others. For this example, we are looking to design a long-term trend following system to trade on the Australian Stock Exchange.

In Australia anything under $1 could be classed as a speculative stock. So how do you stipulate that the stocks you want must be greater than $1? First, “write it in English”: You want stocks with a 21-day average closing price that is greater than $1. Now, you can convert this into a MetaStock formula.

Using the formula reference section in the MetaStock Programming Study Guide, you can check the syntax of a moving average. Once you have this information, it`s simply a matter of plugging in the correct numbers. Then, by using the “greater than” symbol, you can stipulate the price to be greater than $1. The MetaStock code will look like this:

Mov(c,21,s) > 1

Let`s move onto the next component, liquidity. This is a measure of how much money a stock trades. It is important to identify stocks that have enough money moving through them so that you`re never caught with a stock you can`t get out of. For this example, let`s say we require the 21-day average of volume multiplied by the closing price to be greater than $200,000. In MetaStock language this would be:

Mov(v,21,s)*C > 200000

In the next article I`ll go through the last two components needed to design a mechanical entry system in MetaStock. With this information, you will be well on your way to starting an effective, and profitable, trading system in MetaStock.

-=-=-==-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
David Jenyns is recognized as the leading expert when it comes to MetaStock and designing profitable trading systems.

His MetaStock website offers a huge free collection of trading related tips and tricks. Gain free access now.
Click Here ==> http://www.meta-formula.com/subscribe
-=-=-==-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Jenyns

Technorati Tags:

Designing a Trading System in MetaStock – Part 1

By David Jenyns

In this three article series, I`m going to guide you through the process I use to design a trading system using MetaStock. I’ll cover the four major components that every successful trading system has in common, and then I’ll show you how to code these components into the MetaStock program. Please note that this is by no means investment advice and any information I cover is purely for illustrative purposes.

I am a technical analyst by trade. It is my belief that all fundamental and economic influences on a stock price are taken into consideration by the market. Therefore, I focus my attention on price action. All my trading systems are based on this understanding of the market, and the rules of my systems are built to respond to price actions. In this article, I’ll cover the basic rules of trading:

  • Entry rules (when you get into a position)
  • Exit rules (when you get out of one)
  • Money Management rules (how much do you put in a trade?)
  • Back-Testing (does the system work historically?)

These four components make up a proven formula for designing profitable trading systems in MetaStock. Let’s start with the first part.

A stock passing through a precise set of conditions creates entry signals before you will enter a trade on that security. I believe the rules set to signal an entry into a position should leave no room for individual judgment. I follow the KISS principal – that is they should Keep It Simple Simon.

Remember, there is no Holy Grail of entry systems. There is no MetaStock formula that will get you in at exactly the right time, everytime. With this in mind, it’s your goal to construct a simple, yet robust entry system.

Even though I always say that the entry is the least important component of any trading system, you still must have some way to enter a trade. Here are the points that I think are important to consider when identifying possible entry points.

PRICE: It is important to set price maximums/minimums because a stock’s price can determine its attributes. For example, speculative stocks tend to be cheaper, and blue chip shares tend to be more expensive.

LIDUIDITY: This is a measure of how much money the stock trades at. You need to set minimum levels of liquidity to keep you out of stocks that simply don’t trade enough. You can risk being trapped in stocks where the market is moving against you if they have a low liquidity.

VOLATILITY: This measurement tells you how much a stock moves. It is important to trade stocks that move enough for you to make a profit, yet aren’t so erratic that you can’t sleep at night.

TREND: This is the cornerstone of technical analysis. Remember that “the trend is your friend” and that you always want to trade with it, not against it. You will need a way to measure trend in your system.

TRIGGER: This is the point that will indicate it is time to enter a trade. The trigger condition occurs only at one point in time and doesn’t hold “true” over extended periods of time, such as with a moving average cross over.

When combined, these components are going to make up your entry rules. But, before we even begin coding this into MetaStock, you need to determine one of the most critical elements of any system. What time frame are you going to trade?

+ Short-term, such as a reversal trader

or

+ Long-term, such as a trend follower

There are distinct differences between these two types of systems and your choice here will have a marked effect on every other decision you make about your system.

Short-term systems tend to require a greater time commitment, and more money. However, the benefit of trading more often is that usually your profits are more consistent, and are realised more frequently.

Conversely, longer-term systems tend to require less time, and less money. However, since you are keeping your positions open longer, you need to wait until positions are closed out before you can collect any profits.

Generally, I steer my clients, particularly those who are just starting out, to a longer-term trend following system. It takes less time, less money, there is less risk and it is easier to do than short-term trading. In addition, trend following systems tend to have a higher win to loss ratios and are psychologically easier to follow because of this.

For the sake of this example, let us construct a trend following system. In the next two articles, I’ll explain how to code the four entry components of a trend following system into MetaStock.

David Jenyns is recognized as the leading expert when it comes to MetaStock and designing profitable trading systems.

His MetaStock website offers a huge free collection of trading related tips and tricks. Gain free access now.
Click Here ==> http://www.meta-formula.com/subscribe

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Jenyns

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Links to our most popular categories Alerts Backtesting Commodities Forex Gold Recent Articles Training Videos